Steeped in Two MindSets Schumpeter in the Contex

Authors: Erik S Reinert

Publish Date: 2003

Volume: , Issue: , Pages: 261-292

PDF Link

Abstract

In the first section of the paper we point to Marx and Schumpeter as being the only well known economists from a long and distinguished tradition in economics In section two we outline a potentially significant ‘blind spot’ in Schumpeter’s History of Economic Analysis 1954 In part three we discuss Schumpeter’s apparently different approach to that of traditional German economics as regards economics as a theory of practical action and find that early in his life Schumpeter held a different view In part four we discuss Schumpeter’s theoretical duality in the context of a typology of economic theories Section five outlines the contrasting basic assumptions of the two types of economic theory While biographical analyses of Schumpeter’s Harvard years have focused on his work in the Economics department in section six of this paper we emphasize his activities at Harvard Business School and at the Research Center in Entrepreneurial History In section seven we briefly discuss Schumpeter’s ‘failed’ attempt to produce a work in the German historical tradition Business Cycles 1939 Section eight provides the conclusion by putting Schumpeter’s merited ascent as an economic theorist in a context where his thoughts are not as original as they appear today but rather that the less understood part of Schumpeter was a logical extension of a long and noble economic tradition which has fallen into oblivion

Keywords: