Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: Anim Cogn

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: Animal Cognition

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1016/j.aim.2005.06.004

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1435-9456

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

Cognitive development in object manipulation by in

Authors: Misato Hayashi Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Publish Date: 2003/08/07
Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 225-233
PDF Link

Abstract

This study focuses on the development of spontaneous object manipulation in three infant chimpanzees during their first 2 years of life The three infants were raised by their biological mothers who lived among a group of chimpanzees A human tester conducted a series of cognitive tests in a triadic situation where mothers collaborated with the researcher during the testing of the infants Four tasks were presented taken from normative studies of cognitive development of Japanese infants inserting objects into corresponding holes in a box seriating nesting cups inserting variously shaped objects into corresponding holes in a template and stacking up wooden blocks The mothers had already acquired skills to perform these manipulation tasks The infants were free to observe the mothers manipulative behavior from immediately after birth We focused on object–object combinations that were made spontaneously by the infant chimpanzees without providing food reinforcement for any specific behavior that the infants performed The three main findings can be summarized as follows First there was precocious appearance of object–object combination in infant chimpanzees the age of onset 8–11 months was comparable to that in humans around 10 months oldSecond object–object combinations in chimpanzees remained at a low frequency between 11 and 16 months then increased dramatically at the age of approximately 15 years At the same time the accuracy of these object–object combinations also increased Third chimpanzee infants showed inserting behavior frequently and from an early age but they did not exhibit stacking behavior during their first 2 years of life in clear contrast to human dataThis study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education Science and Culture in Japan to the second author 12002009 10CE2005 and 21COE program A2 to Kyoto University We would like to thank Masaki Tomonaga Masayuki Tanaka Hideko Takeshita Masuo Koyasu and Sakiko Yoshikawa for helpful support and suggestions Special thanks are due to Masako MyowaYamakoshi and Yu Mizuno for their advice and help given during the course of conducting experiments We also thank Dora Biro for help given in the course of revising the manuscript We are grateful to all of the staff at the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University who work with the chimpanzees The present study complies with the laws of Japan


Keywords:

References


.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:

  1. Discrimination of small quantities by fish (redtail splitfin, Xenotoca eiseni )
  2. Horses ( Equus caballus ) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts
  3. Does urbanization facilitate individual recognition of humans by house sparrows?
  4. The cognitive capabilities of farm animals: categorisation learning in dwarf goats ( Capra hircus )
  5. The cognitive capabilities of farm animals: categorisation learning in dwarf goats ( Capra hircus )
  6. Effects of the menstrual cycle on looking preferences for faces in female rhesus monkeys
  7. Decision-making under risk and ambiguity in low-birth-weight pigs
  8. Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus , respond differently to the scent marks of multiple male conspecifics
  9. The impact of landmark properties in shaping exploration and navigation
  10. Concept of uprightness in baboons: assessment with pictures of realistic scenes
  11. Audiovisual integration facilitates monkeys’ short-term memory
  12. The gestural repertoire of the wild chimpanzee
  13. Temporal dynamics of information use in learning and retention of predator-related information in tadpoles
  14. Ultra-rapid categorisation in non-human primates
  15. Functionally referential and intentional communication in the domestic dog: effects of spatial and social contexts
  16. What limits tool use in nonhuman primates? Insights from tufted capuchin monkeys ( Sapajus spp.) and chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) aligning three-dimensional objects to a surface
  17. Effects of number of items on the baboon’s discrimination of same from different visual displays
  18. Intraspecific variability in associative learning in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis
  19. The cognitive implications of asymmetric color generalization in honeybees
  20. Tactics to obtain a hidden food item in chimpanzee pairs ( Pan troglodytes )
  21. How do keas ( Nestor notabilis ) solve artificial-fruit problems with multiple locks?
  22. Why do seals have cones? Behavioural evidence for colour-blindness in harbour seals
  23. Do apes and monkeys rely upon conceptual reversibility?
  24. Sensory information and associative cues used in food detection by wild vervet monkeys
  25. Representational insight in pigeons: comparing subjects with and without real-life experience
  26. Visual discrimination of rotated 3D objects in Malawi cichlids ( Pseudotropheus sp.): a first indication for form constancy in fishes
  27. Adult but not juvenile Barbary macaques spontaneously recognize group members from pictures
  28. Capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella ) respond to video images of themselves
  29. A reappraisal of successive negative contrast in two populations of domestic dogs
  30. Visual preferences for sex and status in female rhesus macaques
  31. Do orangutans ( Pongo pygmaeus ) know when they do not remember?

Search Result: