Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion goin

Authors: Felix Strebel Thomas Widmer

Publish Date: 2012/09/28

Volume: 45, Issue: 4, Pages: 385-398

PDF Link

Abstract

Quantitativeoriented diffusion studies either focused on diffusion patterns or mechanisms take for granted that policy adoptions are manifest and therefore directly observable in the legislation A more nuanced perspective of policy adoption taking into account gradual differences between adoption and nonadoption is proposed with this paper valid for diffusion among communities and states in federal settings and among countries on the global level Besides the aspect of visibility intentions are also important when measures are adopted While some measures are transferred with a clear instrumental aim others are rather transferred for symbolical reasons Looking at specific processes the paper proposes a concept that disentangles the current understanding of policy diffusion and provides empirical evidence that current diffusion research misconceives instances The four different transfer types are illustrated with empirical evidence from subnational energy policymaking in Switzerland The systematic investigation of the cases allows to finding explanations for the different transfer typesResearch was conducted in the Energy Policy Fundamentals Research Program funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE Project number 102670 We thank the SFOE for the enabling of this project and the valuable feedback In addition we would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor of Policy Sciences Toddi Steelman for their helpful comments

Keywords: