A comparison of progressive hydrothermal carbonate

Authors: J F Davies R E Whitehead J Huang S Nawaratne

Publish Date: 2013/09/27

Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 65-72

PDF Link

Abstract

Because of major differences in both bulk chemical composition and silicate mineralogy between metabasalts and metaperidotites valid comparison of the degree or intensity of carbonate alteration cannot be made in terms of weight per cent CO2 Molar CO2/CaO is preferred as an index of the intensity of carbonate alteration in metabasalts molar CO2/CaO in carbonatized metabasalts is independent of CaO/MgO and only mildly sensitive to bulk composition and to the proportions of tremolite and clinozoisite Molar CO2/CaO reflect the proportions of calcite and dolomite in metabasalts and the proportions of dolomite and magnesite in metaperidotites However neither molar CO2/CaO nor the proportions of dolomite and magnesite are reliable measures of carbonate alteration in metaperidotites of variable composition because both are strongly dependent on MgO/CaO in the whole rock The preferred alteration index in metaperidotites is m CO2/m CaO + MgO + FeO which represents the proportion of total relevant cations that exist in carbonate form An empirical equation relating molar CO2/CaO in metabasalts x and MCO2/mCaO+MgO+FeO in metaperidotites y is y=016+030 x

Keywords: