Is it rational to have rational expectations

Authors: Alan Kirman

Publish Date: 2014/02/01

Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 29-48

PDF Link

Abstract

In economics in situations where there is uncertainty one has to attribute some attitude to handling this uncertainty to individuals The original idea was to assume that “people do not make systematic mistakes” for which Muth coined the term “rational expectations” This was replaced by a much more formal vision which suggested that people fully understand how the economy evolves In this paper I will argue that the foundations of the “rational expectations” hypothesis which has underpinned most recent modern macroeconomic models which have in turn been used for policymaking are unsound From a philosophical point of view the idea that agents can not only forecast the evolution of their environment but also their own evolution seems unjustified If agents do manage to coordinate on specific expectations these may not be rational and can be self fulfilling From an econometric point of view when there are changes in the evolution of the economy it is not rational to satisfy the hypothesis Furthermore the empirical and experimental evidence suggests that we should abandon this routeI would like to thank Marco Novarese Riccardo Viale and Bruno Contini for their helpful comments I would also like to express my gratitude to Cars Hommes Roger Guesnerie Nobuyuki Hanaki and all the friends and colleagues with whom I have had discussions and even arguments about rational expectations This work was partly financed by the JSPSANR bilateral project ANR11FRJA0002“BECOA”

Keywords: