Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: TechTrends

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer US

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1007/s40278-015-10095-8

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1559-7075

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

Does media affect learning where are we now

Authors: Nancy B Hastings Monica W Tracey
Publish Date: 2007/12/05
Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 28-30
PDF Link

Abstract

A careful review of the arguments and counter arguments presented by Clark 1983 1994 and Kozma 1991 1994 responses published in the past 20 years Jonassen Campbell Davidson 1994 Morrison 1994 Reiser 1994 Shrock 1994 and existing instructional design literature Morrison Ross Kemp 2001 Reiser Dick 1996 Smith Ragan 1999 indicates there is and always has been significantly more agreement on this subject than the debate would indicateClark never said that a textbook could deliver an instructional method requiring the use of a 3dimensional graphic representation as effectively as a computer nor did Kozma maintain that the computer was the only medium with the capabilities to do so Both acknowledged that the two instructional components — the instructional methods and the delivery medium — must be aligned to facilitate learningThe debate is and always has been about the ability of more than one medium to support a selected instructional method whether or not any given medium has capabilities that cannot be replicated by another medium and the validity of the research We believe that today in 2005 • Computers are capable of supporting instructional methods that other media are not • Computers by means of their unique capabilities affect learning • Computers are often the most costeffective efficient delivery method for any given unit of instruction We also • Acknowledge the limitations of media comparison studies • Acknowledge the need to align the message the medium and the learning task • Agree that some media are interchangeable and • Support the use of the most costeffective efficient delivery method for any given unit of instruction We believe that after 22 years it is time to reframe the original debate to ask not if but how media affects learning We agree that media comparison studies are inherently flawed and support the argument that we must identify research designs that will provide answers to this question in significantly less time


Keywords:

References


.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:


Search Result: