Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: Sci Educ

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: Science & Education

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1016/j.asams.2006.08.003

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1573-1901

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

Matthew Cobb 2007 Emphasis Type="Italic"The E

Authors: Erik L Peterson
Publish Date: 2011/06/21
Volume: 21, Issue: 7, Pages: 1045-1049
PDF Link

Abstract

“Why study scientific ideas that we know to be wrong” It’s a question I am asked every time I teach a history of science course to undergrads majoring in a natural science Despite an urge to fling a witty Ricky Gervais style retort at any asker of this question I usually respond with an arched eyebrow and suitably mysterious counterquestion “How do you know we’re right” My response is not as flippant as it might seem especially as we do spend a fair portion of the course examining scientific epistemology Nevertheless many of my students chuckle at my rejoinder “How do we know that we’re right” they might respond “Because everyoneknows that our scientists know the right answers to certain fundamental questions about the world” Whether their imagined response is circular is beside the point The implications of their attitude for the material we cover in my history of science course are straightforward if I pressed them they would probably admit that it is perfectly


Keywords:

References


.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:


Search Result: