Authors: Timothy Perrine
Publish Date: 2014/09/24
Volume: 54, Issue: 1, Pages: 35-43
Abstract
In a recent article David Kyle Johnson has claimed to have provided a ‘refutation’ of skeptical theism Johnson’s refutation raises several interesting issues But in this note I focus on only one—an implicit principle Johnson uses in his refutation to update probabilities after receiving new evidence I argue that this principle is false Consequently Johnson’s refutation as it currently stands is undermined
Keywords: