Absolute Power and Contingency on the Theological

Authors: Hollis Phelps

Publish Date: 2015/01/31

Volume: 54, Issue: 3, Pages: 343-362

PDF Link

Abstract

Although Quentin Meillassoux’s philosophy desires to be postmetaphysical and posttheological I argue in this paper that it remains structurally theological Specifically I argue that Meillassoux’s speculative thesis on the contingency of nature and its laws repeats at a formal level the medieval theological distinction between God’s absolute power and God’s ordained power The first part of this paper discusses how this distinction allowed medieval theologians such as Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus to understand and have faith in the stable contingency of the present order of things in light of divine omnipotence The second part of this paper discusses how Meillassoux repeats this distinction intentionally or not between God’s absolute power and God’s ordained power in his attempt to think the absolute contingency of the laws of nature as an effect of hyperChaos Although unlike the medieval God Meillassoux’s hyperChaos remains fundamentally without reason and devoid of any moral valence I argue in the third section of this paper that Meillassoux sneaks in an existential faith in the present and future order of things with his appeal to hope in a speculative resurrection of the dead a move that brings him further in line with the substance of the distinction between God’s absolute power and God’s ordained power

Keywords: