Journal Title
Title of Journal: J Public Health
|
Abbravation: Journal of Public Health
|
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
|
|
|
|
Authors: Thomas Elkeles Wolf Kirschner Christian Graf Petra KellermannMühlhoff
Publish Date: 2008/12/23
Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 205-216
Abstract
The Disease Management Programmes DMPs introduced in Germany since 2003 are intended to improve health care for the chronically ill Whether they do this is currently being investigated in various evaluation settings In order to assess possible changes in the process quality from the point of view of patients the BARMER health insurance company conducted a national postal survey in Germany in 2007 of its customers with diabetes mellitus type 2 in order to compare programme participants and nonparticipants This evaluation is a subanalysis intended to clarify whether the utilisation acceptability and perceived benefits of the programme differ as a result of educational statusA nationally representative random sample was drawn from BARMER insurance customers with type 2 diabetes aged 45–79 years Questionnaires were evaluated from 385 of the sample DMPparticipant respondents n = 2158 nonparticipant respondents n = 2182A lower educational status was related among other things with increased morbidity a poorer level of information and also a less welldeveloped “preventive attitude” to the disease The finding that 49 of participants had a higher school qualification compared with 45 of nonparticipants although significant is less pronounced than the differences found between DMP participants and nonparticipants for other values analysed A social influence could be found concerning the differences in treatment provided within the programme A multivariate analysis shows that both the participation in the programme and higher levels of education have independent positive effects on the satisfaction with health status with the effect of programme participation being strongerIt can be assumed that the clear differences established between the groups of DMP participants and nonparticipants can in no way be explained solely by the comparatively small difference related to school education Patients obviously appreciate the fact that the health personnel and the insurance company are paying increased interest to their disease and this is true to an increased degree for participants with only basic schooling Although overall this group is significantly underrepresented among the participants they reported to an increased degree that they were profiting from the programme
Keywords:
.
|
Other Papers In This Journal:
- Zinc deficiency in a semiurban Nigerian community: prevalence and relationship with socioeconomic status and indices of metabolic syndrome
- Revisiting the evidence on health and health care disparities among the Roma: a systematic review 2003–2012
- Resources for and barriers to effective diabetes care management—experiences and perspectives of people with type 2 diabetes
- Evidence-based physical activity promotion - HEPA Europe, the European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity
- Body shape, body size and cigarette smoking relationships
- Changing patterns of mortality in 25 European countries and their economic and political correlates, 1955–1989
- Assessment of health risk behaviours and their interrelationships among young people from two counties of Romania
- Rolf Rosenbrock, Thomas Gerlinger: Gesundheitspolitik—Eine systematische Einführung
- Assessment, training and quality: Evaluation of some vocational rehabilitation programmes
- Maija Becker-Kontio, Agnes Kimmig-Pfeiffer u. a. (Hrsg.): Supervision und Organisationsberatung im Krankenhaus
- Implementation and impact of a meningococcal C conjugate vaccination program in 13- to 25-year-old individuals in Galicia, Spain
- Injuries related to the Feast of Holy Sacrifice
- Temperature variation between neighboring days and mortality: a distributed lag non-linear analysis
- Geschlechtsunterschiede in der Prävalenz depressiver Symptomatik: Ein Resultat differentieller Validität der Erhebungsinstrumente?
- Public health and natural disasters: disaster preparedness and response in health systems
- Preventing interpersonal violence in Panama: is a parenting intervention developed in Australia culturally appropriate?
- Prostate-specific antigen testing in Tyrol, Austria: prostate cancer mortality reduction was supported by an update with mortality data up to 2008
- Reliability of coding causes of death with ICD-10 in Germany
- Mediterranean studies of cardiovascular disease and hyperglycemia: analytical modeling of population socio-economic transitions (MedCHAMPS)—rationale and methods
- Self-help groups for psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders in Germany—themes, frequency and support by self-help advice centres
- A comparison of depression prevalence estimates measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire with two administration modes: computer-assisted telephone interviewing versus computer-assisted personal interviewing
- Trajectories for women who disclose intimate partner violence in health care settings: the key role of abuse severity
- Postpartum depressive symptoms in the first 17 months after childbirth: the impact of an emotionally supportive partnership
- Surveillance of working conditions and the work environment: development of a national hazard surveillance tool in New Zealand
- Addressing the socioeconomic determinants of adolescent health: experiences from the WHO/HBSC Forum 2007
- Activity limitation, chronic disease, and comorbid serious psychological distress in U.S. adults – BRFSS 2007
- Three types of scientific evidence to inform physical activity policy: results from a comparative scoping review
- Subjective health, symptom load and quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe
- The DAFNE databank: the past and future of monitoring the dietary habits of Europeans
- Socioeconomic, health, and dietary determinants of multivitamin supplements use in Belgium
- Predictive utility of the NEO-FFI for later substance experiences among 16-year-old adolescents
- The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children: WHO Collaborative Cross-National (HBSC) Study: origins, concept, history and development 1982–2008
- The impact of work on morbidity-related early retirement
- Smoking among pregnant women in small towns in Poland
- Regional differences of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Swiss children are not explained by socio-demographics or the built environment
- Socio-economic inequality in multiple health complaints among adolescents: international comparative study in 37 countries
- Child health indicators of life and development and the challenge of nutrition
- Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality—a spatial analysis in Bremen, Germany
- Best practices for promoting farmers’ health: the case of arsenic history
- Reforming Germany’s risk structure equalization scheme—taking stock at the halfway point
- Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among adults in Aleppo, Syria
- What is the accurate knowledge of the German population regarding sexual HIV transmission?
- Social Epidemiology after the German Reunification: East vs. West or Poor vs. Rich?
- Differences in stakeholders’ and end users’ preferences of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh
- Premature deciduous tooth loss and orthodontic treatment need: a 6-year prospective study
- The average age of smoking onset in Germany – trends and correlates
|