Authors: Yu V Larichev D A Shlyapin P G Tsyrul’nikov V I Bukhtiyarov
Publish Date: 2007/09/18
Volume: 120, Issue: 3-4, Pages: 204-209
Abstract
Sibunitsupported Rucatalysts promoted with cesium or rubidium compounds have been comparatively studied with XPS The cesium promoter interacts both with support and with active component The absence of the promoter–support interaction in the case of rubidium provides a stronger interaction between promoter and active component compared to the cesiumbased catalysts These differences in the promoter–support and promoter–metal interactions are exhibited when a sequence of ruthenium and alkali introduction are changed
Keywords: