Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: Accred Qual Assur

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1016/0302-4598(94)05014-l

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1432-0517

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

About acceptance and rejection zones as defined in

Authors: Elio Desimoni Barbara Brunetti
Publish Date: 2009/07/04
Volume: 15, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-47
PDF Link

Abstract

Considering measurement uncertainty is mandatory in assessing conformance to legal or compositional limits and specific guidelines are available issued by ASME ISO and Eurachem/CITAC However differences between ISO and EURACHEM/CITAC wordings could induce some perplexities in the most careful readers Possible problems arise from considering that before performing a test it should be decided whether it is to be a test for conformity or a test for nonconformity This choice could perhaps require some renaming of acceptance/rejection zones as defined in the EURACHEM/CITAC Guide A tentative solution is discussed in this contribution

Keywords:

References

.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:
  1. Establishing the cut-off value of a screening method
  2. From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation
  3. Quality by Design applications in biosimilar pharmaceutical products
  4. The application of data from proficiency testing to laboratory accreditation according to ISO 17025
  5. Homogeneity studies and ISO Guide 35:2006
  6. Interpretation of the measurement results near the detection limit in gamma-ray spectrometry using Bayesian statistics
  7. Must participation in an interlaboratory comparison be (very) frequent?
  8. Preparation of an infant formula proficiency testing material and assessment of its homogeneity and stability
  9. Local comparability of proficiency testing results: determination of concrete slump and compressive strength values
  10. EURACHEM/CITAC workshop on recent developments in measurement uncertainty
  11. Making progress in a practical discipline
  12. Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: discussions on current practice and future directions
  13. Adequacy in the metrology of chemical analysis and other complicated measurements
  14. Quantitative NMR spectroscopy for accurate purity determination of amino acids, and uncertainty evaluation for different signals
  15. Discussion on classification and performance evaluation of diversified testing procedures
  16. Laboratory accreditation: Proof of performance for environmental laboratories—2001 study
  17. Lectures for chemists on statistics II. The normal distribution: a briefer on the univariate case
  18. Evaluation of proficiency tests in microbiological analysis: enumeration of aerobic microorganisms
  19. Impact of Eurachem 25 years of activity
  20. Response on “Regulations in the field of residue and doping analysis should ensure a well-defined risk of a false positive declaration” by N. M. Faber
  21. Considerations for the development and application of control materials to improve metagenomic microbial community profiling
  22. Use of an excess variance approach for the certification of reference materials by interlaboratory comparison
  23. Traceability of measurement results in chemistry: a case study of certification of three new pharmaceutical reference materials
  24. Long-term (2001–2012) study of a proficiency testing scheme for textiles
  25. The accreditation of reference material producers — EUROLAB's position
  26. From a single analyzer to multiple instruments—The GUM approach
  27. About some basic concepts for metrology in analytical chemistry
Search Result: