Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: Accred Qual Assur

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1006/jcat.1993.1104

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1432-0517

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

Discussion on classification and performance evalu

Authors: Lu Xiaohua Li Hongmei
Publish Date: 2017/02/04
Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 97-102
PDF Link

Abstract

More and more testing procedures with different principles are being developed covering both quantitative and qualitative analyses To ensure the reliability of them and relevant testing results performance evaluation and method validation are necessary Following the investigation into a variety of testing procedures this paper is intended to discuss the rational classification of them according to the nature and purpose of testing Five kinds of testing procedures are summarized according to different combination of input and output properties of the testing model which are properties on nominal ordinal interval and ratio scales On this basis the method validation and performance evaluation parameters statistical approaches and tools available for each group of testing procedures are discussed The classification of testing procedures seems helpful for intercomparison of testing procedures with different purposes and application fields and the development of some general rules for the performance evaluation and validation of them


Keywords:

References


.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:

  1. Establishing the cut-off value of a screening method
  2. About acceptance and rejection zones as defined in the EURACHEM/CITAC Guide (2007) “Use of uncertainty information in compliance assessment”
  3. From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation
  4. Quality by Design applications in biosimilar pharmaceutical products
  5. The application of data from proficiency testing to laboratory accreditation according to ISO 17025
  6. Homogeneity studies and ISO Guide 35:2006
  7. Interpretation of the measurement results near the detection limit in gamma-ray spectrometry using Bayesian statistics
  8. Must participation in an interlaboratory comparison be (very) frequent?
  9. Preparation of an infant formula proficiency testing material and assessment of its homogeneity and stability
  10. Local comparability of proficiency testing results: determination of concrete slump and compressive strength values
  11. EURACHEM/CITAC workshop on recent developments in measurement uncertainty
  12. Making progress in a practical discipline
  13. Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: discussions on current practice and future directions
  14. Adequacy in the metrology of chemical analysis and other complicated measurements
  15. Quantitative NMR spectroscopy for accurate purity determination of amino acids, and uncertainty evaluation for different signals
  16. Laboratory accreditation: Proof of performance for environmental laboratories—2001 study
  17. Lectures for chemists on statistics II. The normal distribution: a briefer on the univariate case
  18. Evaluation of proficiency tests in microbiological analysis: enumeration of aerobic microorganisms
  19. Impact of Eurachem 25 years of activity
  20. Response on “Regulations in the field of residue and doping analysis should ensure a well-defined risk of a false positive declaration” by N. M. Faber
  21. Considerations for the development and application of control materials to improve metagenomic microbial community profiling
  22. Use of an excess variance approach for the certification of reference materials by interlaboratory comparison
  23. Traceability of measurement results in chemistry: a case study of certification of three new pharmaceutical reference materials
  24. Long-term (2001–2012) study of a proficiency testing scheme for textiles
  25. The accreditation of reference material producers — EUROLAB's position
  26. From a single analyzer to multiple instruments—The GUM approach
  27. About some basic concepts for metrology in analytical chemistry

Search Result: