Ecosystem services in mountain regions experts’ p

Authors: Christin Haida Johannes Rüdisser Ulrike Tappeiner

Publish Date: 2015/02/05

Volume: 16, Issue: 7, Pages: 1989-2004

PDF Link

Abstract

Facing the challenges of global and regional changes society urgently needs applicable and broadly accepted tools to effectively manage and protect ecosystem services ES This requires knowing which ES are perceived as important We asked decisionmakers from different thematic backgrounds to rank 25 ES on the basis of their importance for society To test whether perceptions are varying across regions we surveyed three Alpine regions in Austria and Italy The ranking of importance showed a high variability amongst experts but was not influenced by region or thematic background ES that satisfy physiological needs ‘fresh water’ ‘food’ ‘air quality regulation’ were indicated as most important ES that relate to safety and security needs were ranked in the middle field whereas cultural ES were perceived as less important We used principal component analysis PCA to identify ES bundles based on perception of importance In order to investigate whether research intensity follows the perceived importance we related the interviews with a comprehensive literature review ‘Global climate regulation’ ‘food’ ‘biodiversity’ ‘fresh water’ and ‘water quality’ were studied most often Although ‘habitat’ ‘energy’ ‘primary production’ ‘tourism’ ‘water cycle’ and ‘local climate regulation’ were ranked as important by decisionmakers they did not receive corresponding research attention We conclude that more interaction between research and stakeholders is needed to promote a broader application and understanding of the ES concept in practice The use of ES bundles could help to manage its inherent complexity and facilitate its applicationWe would like to thank all interviewees for their input to this study Our special thanks go to Christian Georges and Gottfried Tappeiner for their useful advice and discussions to Andrew Greenbank for his thorough proofreading and to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable input This study was part of the project ‘SHIFT’ funded by the COMET programme the Austrian Climate Research Funds project ‘CAFEE—Climate change in agriculture and forestry an integrated assessment of mitigation and adaptation measures in Austria’ and the binational project ‘Ecology of the Alpine region’ Ulrike Tappeiner is a member of the research area ‘Alpine Space—Man and Environment’ at the University of Innsbruck

Keywords: