Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: Synthese

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: Synthese

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1016/0267-3649(94)90050-7

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1573-0964

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

Ordering effects updating effects and the specte

Authors: Zachary Horne Jonathan Livengood
Publish Date: 2015/12/17
Volume: 194, Issue: 4, Pages: 1189-1218
PDF Link

Abstract

One widelyendorsed argument in the experimental philosophy literature maintains that intuitive judgments are unreliable because they are influenced by the order in which thought experiments prompting those judgments are presented Here we explicitly state this argument from ordering effects and show that any plausible understanding of the argument leads to an untenable conclusion First we show that the normative principle is ambiguous On one reading of the principle the empirical observation is wellsupported but the normative principle is false On the other reading the empirical observation has only weak support and the normative principle if correct would impugn the reliability of deliberative reasoning testimony memory and perception since judgments in all these areas are sensitive to ordering in the relevant sense We then reflect on what goes wrong with the argumentThanks to Josh Alexander Wes Buckwalter Greg Gandenberger Balazs Gyenis John Hummel Josh Knobe Dan Korman Conor MayoWilson Derek Powell David Rose Jonah Schupbach Eric Schwitzgebel John Turri Jonathan Waskan Dan Malinsky Shaun Nichols and two anonymous referees for comments on earlier drafts


Keywords:

References


.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:

  1. Foiling the Black Knight
  2. Physicalism and strict implication
  3. Adequate formalization
  4. Desires, beliefs and conditional desirability
  5. Inscrutability and visual objects
  6. Margin for error semantics and signal perception
  7. Sleeping Beauty and Self-location: A Hybrid Model
  8. Phylogenetic inference to the best explanation and the bad lot argument
  9. Against a descriptive vindication of doxastic voluntarism
  10. Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question
  11. Parsing the rainbow
  12. Why neuroscience matters to cognitive neuropsychology
  13. Why neuroscience matters to cognitive neuropsychology
  14. Existence problems in philosophy and science
  15. Logic and social interaction: introduction
  16. Similarity and cotenability
  17. Towards a reflexive framework for development: technology transfer after the empirical turn
  18. A triviality result for the “Desire by Necessity” thesis
  19. The ontology of social groups
  20. Which empathy? Limitations in the mirrored “understanding” of emotion
  21. “If you’d wiggled A, then B would’ve changed”
  22. Recognition-primed group decisions via judgement aggregation
  23. A discrete solution for the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise
  24. A foundation for presentism
  25. Externalism and “knowing what” one thinks
  26. Comparative syllogism and counterfactual knowledge
  27. Semantics, conceptual spaces, and the meeting of minds
  28. Inference to the best explanation and mathematical realism
  29. Why follow the royal rule?
  30. Evolutionary dynamics of Lewis signaling games: signaling systems vs. partial pooling
  31. Can the new indispensability argument be saved from Euclidean rescues?
  32. Starting from the scenario Euclid–Bolyai–Einstein
  33. Reversing 30 years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box
  34. On denying presuppositions
  35. Remarks on counterpossibles
  36. Knowledge and the norm of assertion: a simple test
  37. Information, possible worlds and the cooptation of scepticism
  38. Levels of communication and lexical semantics
  39. Many entities, no identity
  40. Why Euclid’s geometry brooked no doubt: J. H. Lambert on certainty and the existence of models

Search Result: