Paper Search Console

Home Search Page About Contact

Journal Title

Title of Journal: Synthese

Search In Journal Title:

Abbravation: Synthese

Search In Journal Abbravation:

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Search In Publisher:

DOI

10.1016/0001-8686(91)80026-g

Search In DOI:

ISSN

1573-0964

Search In ISSN:
Search In Title Of Papers:

The ontology of social groups

Authors: Amie L Thomasson
Publish Date: 2016/08/09
Volume: , Issue: , Pages: 1-17
PDF Link

Abstract

Two major questions have dominated work on the metaphysics of social groups first Are there any And second What are they I will begin by arguing that the answer to the ontological question is an easy and obvious ‘yes’ We do better to turn our efforts elsewhere addressing the question “What are social groups” One might worry however about this question on grounds that the general term ‘social group’ seems like a term of art—not a wellused concept we can analyze or can presuppose corresponds to a real kind we can investigate But while the general notion of ‘social group’ may be a term of art our terms for clubs and courts races and genders are not It is worth stepping back to ask what function these social group concepts serve I will argue that individual social group concepts function to give normative structure to our lives together Paying attention to the role of norms in social groups I will argue can enable us to provide a unified understanding of the importance of core social groups while still respecting the great differences among social groups of different kinds


Keywords:

References


.
Search In Abstract Of Papers:
Other Papers In This Journal:

  1. Foiling the Black Knight
  2. Physicalism and strict implication
  3. Adequate formalization
  4. Desires, beliefs and conditional desirability
  5. Inscrutability and visual objects
  6. Margin for error semantics and signal perception
  7. Sleeping Beauty and Self-location: A Hybrid Model
  8. Phylogenetic inference to the best explanation and the bad lot argument
  9. Against a descriptive vindication of doxastic voluntarism
  10. Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question
  11. Parsing the rainbow
  12. Why neuroscience matters to cognitive neuropsychology
  13. Why neuroscience matters to cognitive neuropsychology
  14. Existence problems in philosophy and science
  15. Logic and social interaction: introduction
  16. Similarity and cotenability
  17. Towards a reflexive framework for development: technology transfer after the empirical turn
  18. A triviality result for the “Desire by Necessity” thesis
  19. Which empathy? Limitations in the mirrored “understanding” of emotion
  20. “If you’d wiggled A, then B would’ve changed”
  21. Recognition-primed group decisions via judgement aggregation
  22. A discrete solution for the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise
  23. A foundation for presentism
  24. Externalism and “knowing what” one thinks
  25. Comparative syllogism and counterfactual knowledge
  26. Semantics, conceptual spaces, and the meeting of minds
  27. Inference to the best explanation and mathematical realism
  28. Why follow the royal rule?
  29. Ordering effects, updating effects, and the specter of global skepticism
  30. Evolutionary dynamics of Lewis signaling games: signaling systems vs. partial pooling
  31. Can the new indispensability argument be saved from Euclidean rescues?
  32. Starting from the scenario Euclid–Bolyai–Einstein
  33. Reversing 30 years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box
  34. On denying presuppositions
  35. Remarks on counterpossibles
  36. Knowledge and the norm of assertion: a simple test
  37. Information, possible worlds and the cooptation of scepticism
  38. Levels of communication and lexical semantics
  39. Many entities, no identity
  40. Why Euclid’s geometry brooked no doubt: J. H. Lambert on certainty and the existence of models

Search Result: