Authors: Peter D Fabricant
Publish Date: 2016/09/14
Volume: 475, Issue: 6, Pages: 1570-1572
Abstract
This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article “Does the Utilization of Allograft Tissue in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Restore Patellar Stability” by Hohn and Pandya available at DOI 101007/s1199901650604The author certifies that he or a member of his immediate family has no funding or commercial associations eg consultancies stock ownership equity interest patent/licensing arrangements etc that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted articleIn their study Drs Hohn and Pandya explored the use of allograft tissue for medial patellafemoral ligament MPFL reconstruction in a cohort of 25 pediatric and adolescent patients Eight percent developed recurrent instability at an average of 2 years after surgery Despite being a retrospective study without a control group the authors provide an important contribution to what we know about patellofemoral instability surgery as posing this question in a purely pediatric population is novel and lays the groundwork for future critical investigationRecently Weinberger and colleagues 8 performed a metaanalysis of observational studies comparing clinical outcomes in adult patients following MPFL reconstruction with autograft versus allograft Although they observed greater improvement in Kujala scores among patients who received autograft reconstructions they noted no difference in the frequency of recurrent patellofemoral instability between groups 57 for autograft 67 for allograft 8 This was evident despite the inclusion of all allograft processing techniques including irradiation which if anything would bias those results in favor of using autograft as allograft irradiation can lead to structural compromise 2With regard to ligament reconstructions in young athletes in general it has been well documented that the use of allograft tissue for primary ACL reconstruction in young athletes is associated with an increased risk of graft rupture 3 4 7 However given the dissimilarities between the ACL and the MPFL in terms of anatomy and function it may not be appropriate to apply findings from the ACL literature to those patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction The ACL is a stout intraarticular structure that provides knee stability throughout all ranges of knee flexion and has a tensile strength of 2160 N 9 By contrast the MPFL is a thin extraarticular structure with a tensile strength of 208 N which acts as a checkrein only in early knee flexion until osseous patellofemoral congruity takes over at 30° of flexion 1 5 At present we lack highlevel comparative studies specific to the MPFL upon which we may draw meaningful data in order to council our pediatric and adolescent patients and their families regarding graft choice for MPFL reconstructionGiven the unique nature of the MPFL and our noted inability to apply concepts from other ligament reconstructions it is important to compare the outcomes including rates of recurrent instability Kujala scores and pediatricvalidated knee activity and quality of life patientreported outcome measures of MPFL reconstruction using autograft to those of allograft using prospective study designs It will be important to account for diagnosed connective tissue disorders as well as subtle ligamentous laxity as generalized joint laxity may be more common in patients with patellofemoral instability than in controls 6 and could be the underlying reason for the lack of definitive superiority of autograft MPFL reconstruction in this demographic Answering this question will allow those who treat pediatric and adolescent patellofemoral instability to guide their patients and families with greater confidence when faced with this disconcerting condition and its treatmentThe ideal study design for determining the efficacy of allograft tissue when compared to autograft for MPFL reconstruction would be a randomized controlled trial Given the clinical equipoise of redislocation rates in adults noted in the study by Weinberger and colleagues 8 and the similar clinical success in children reported by the authors of the current study it would seem ethical to perform such a study However given the substantial resources required to perform randomized controlled trials it would seem appropriate in the interim to compile and analyze existing multicenter registry data ideally data that were prospectively collected in order to garner sufficient statistical power to control for relevant confounding variables For the time being the results from the study by Drs Hohn and Pandya taken together with the findings in adults by Weinberger and colleagues 8 suggest that allograft tissue remains a reasonable option for MPFL reconstruction in children and adolescents particularly in those with connective tissue disease or generalized ligamentous laxity
Keywords: