Authors: John Turri
Publish Date: 2011/12/22
Volume: 163, Issue: 3, Pages: 791-795
Abstract
I evaluate two new objections to an infinitist account of epistemic justification and conclude that they fail to raise any new problems for infinitism The new objections are a refined version of the finitemind objection which says infinitism demands more than finite minds can muster and the normativity objection which says infinitism entails that we are epistemically blameless in holding all our beliefs I show how resources deployed in response to the most popular objection to infinitism the original finitemind objection can be redeployed to address the two new objections
Keywords: