Journal Title
Title of Journal: Philos Stud
|
Abbravation: Philosophical Studies
|
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
|
|
|
|
Authors: Duncan Purves Nicolas Delon
Publish Date: 2017/01/27
Volume: 175, Issue: 2, Pages: 317-338
Abstract
This paper argues that contemporary philosophical literature on meaning in life has important implications for the debate about our obligations to nonhuman animals If animal lives can be meaningful then practices including factory farming and animal research might be morally worse than ethicists have thought We argue for two theses about meaning in life 1 that the best account of meaningful lives must take intentional action to be necessary for meaning—an individual’s life has meaning if and only if the individual acts intentionally in ways that contribute to finally valuable states of affairs and 2 that this first thesis does not entail that only human lives are meaningful Because nonhuman animals can be intentional agents of a certain sort our account yields the verdict that many animals’ lives can be meaningful We conclude by considering the moral implications of these theses for common practices involving animalsWe owe a significant debt to Dale Jamieson and Robert Elliot as well as Cheshire Calhoun Stephen Campbell Sari Kisilevsky Rob MacDougall Collin ONeil Regina Rini and an anonymous referee for this journal for their encouragement and incisive comments on earlier drafts of this paper
Keywords:
.
|
Other Papers In This Journal:
|