Authors: Peder Anker
Publish Date: 2016/03/24
Volume: 151, Issue: 1, Pages: 29-41
Abstract
The shift away from ecology towards climatology in Norwegian environmental policy in the late 1980s and 1990s was not accidental A main mover was the Labor Party politician Gro Harlem Brundtland who did not want to deal with unruly and highly vocal Deep Ecologists Better then to start afresh with a different set of environmental scholars appealing to the technocratic tradition within the Labor Party Instead of changing the ethical and social ways of dealing with environmental problems as the Deep Ecologists were advocating she was looking for technological and economic solutions And she mobilized an international regime of carbon capture storage CCS tradable carbon emissions quota TEQs and clean development mechanisms CDMs all of which eventually were approved in Kyoto in 1997 This move towards technocracy and costbenefit economics reflects a postCold War turn towards utilitarian capitalism but also a longing to showcase Norway as an environmental pioneer country to the world The underlying question was how to reconcile the nation’s booming petroleum industry with reduction in climate gas emissions Should the oil and gas stay underground and the country strive towards the ecologically informed zerogrowth society the Deep Ecologists were envisioning Or could growth in the petroleum industry take place without harming the environment as the Labor Party environmentalists argued
Keywords: